Friday, January 31, 2020
Iliad as a war literature Essay Example for Free
Iliad as a war literature Essay Homerââ¬â¢s epic poem, ââ¬Å"The Iliad,â⬠is probably one of the best stories that tell us about war. In this poem, we see humans fighting with humans, gods fighting with humans, and even gods fighting with gods. Even though it was made some time around the 7th century BC, we can associate with our modern warfare. In Homerââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"Iliad,â⬠we see how the gods manipulated the people in fighting their own wars, just like how political leaders of different countries manipulate their army to fight another country. We can also see that modern wars, just like the Trojan war in ââ¬Å"the Iliad,â⬠can be caused by small matters which were just blown up to huge proportions by those who manipulate these wars. The book can be seen as Homerââ¬â¢s perspective of war. It is somewhat an anti-war literature because it showed how wars usually end. Both sides lost great lives, including some of their respected heroes. In the Greeksââ¬â¢ side, they lost Achillesââ¬â¢ best friend, Patroclus (23. 1-7). On the Trojansââ¬â¢ side, they lost their prince, Hector (24. 21-23). Achilles eventually died some time after, when he was shot by Paris, Hectorââ¬â¢s brother in the heel of his foot which was his weakness. It showed that no one really reigns victorious, even after winning the war. This is because both sides suffer great losses, not only in properties, but also the lives of those who are involved in the war, both armies and civilians. Some attitudes towards war that Homer depicted in Iliad were the possible motives of engaging in wars. The most evident motive in the Trojan War was to retrieve the wife of Menelaus, the brother of the Greek King Agamemnon. They decided to launch an all out war, deploying a fleet of more than a thousand ships in order to retrieve Helen (of Troy) who was abducted by a Trojan prince, Paris (3. 29-31). Another attitude towards war shown in this epic poem was the intervention by higher powers. With the intervention of the Olympian gods and goddesses, the war to regain Helen of Troy was blown up to greater proportions. It became a personal war for these gods and goddesses, especially when they chose to take sides between the Trojans and the Greeks. The gods and goddesses who took the side of the Greeks include Hera, Athena, Poseidon, and Hermes (4. 37-49). On the other hand, the gods who took the side of the Trojans include Aphrodite, Apollo, Artemis, and Leto (1. 10-15). They backed up the soldiers whenever they fight and are usually the ones who decide on how the fight would end. Only Zeus remained in the middle, wherein he forbade the intervention of these gods in the war. Homer was able to depict a war which is similar to our modern day warfare. His depiction of gods was like the political leaders of various nations who would encourage their people to engage in wars against other nations. These are the leaders who are not physically in battle, but are the ones who actually dictate how the wars would go. Also, the wars that they often start would usually mean great losses for both warring sides. The reasons for these wars were very much the same like that of Homerââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"the Iliad. â⬠These are usually small things which could be solved by negotiations, but the pride of the leaders is usually the ones that fuel the war. Leaders like Menelaus and Agamemnon are the same as the political leaders that we have today, who prefers violent negotiations rather than peaceful means to solve conflicts. This usually leaves the country with great problems, like loses of lives and property and a bad economy. Works Cited: Homer. The Iliad. 2006. Spark Notes. October 15 2007. http://pd. sparknotes. com/lit/iliad/section2. html. Sienkewicz, Tom. The Gods in the Iliad. 2002. October 15 2007. http://department. monm. edu/classics/Courses/CLAS210/CourseDocuments/Epic/gods_in_the_iliad. htm.
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Manhattan Project :: essays research papers
Manhattan Project II. The Race for the Bomb The theoretical possibility that an explosion could be brought about by atomic fission became known in 1939, the year that war broke out in Europe. Scientists discovered then that uranium atoms can fission when struck by neutrons to split other atoms in a chain reaction, releasing large amounts of energy. Two Hungarian physicists who had recently emigrated to the United States, Leo Szilard and Eugene Wigner, alerted the US government to the possibility of an atomic bomb. Along with Albert Einstein, they wrote a letter to President Roosevelt warning that Nazi Germany might also be working towards a uranium bomb; many of the important discoveries in atomic physics had been made at German universities. Roosevelt responded by setting up an advisory committee on uranium in October 1939. Under the aegis of this committee, American scientists at several centres examined the problem. The uranium that fissions is an isotope, a variation of an element that is chemically indistinguishable but different in its atomic structure. It is uranium-235, which constitutes only 0.7 per cent of uranium. Scientists questioned whether significant quantities could ever be separated. Much of the initial work was done at Columbia University in New York, and the military direction was from an office in Manhattan. This was located in the Manhattan Engineering District, and the whole programme became the Manhattan Project, under the command of Major General Leslie Groves. Meanwhile, in Britain, two immigrant physicists, the Austrian Otto Frisch and the German Rudolf Peierls, decided that an atomic explosion using uranium-235 was a practical possibility. They alerted the British authorities in early 1940 with a memorandum showing how such a bomb could be produced. After more studies, the British government set up a project to build an atomic bomb. The United States and Britain exchanged information on weapons developments. British progress towards an atomic bomb convinced American scientists in the summer of 1941 that it could be done, and spurred on their work. In November 1941 a committee of scientists recommended that the United States embark on an all-out research programme, and President Roosevelt gave the go-ahead the following January.
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
Chattanooga Ice Cream Case Essay
ABSTRACT In this paper I will do an analysis on what I think cause the downfall of Chattanooga Ice Cream. I will also give and observation of the Chattanooga Ice Cream Division and how lack of respect and communication caused them to lose one of their biggest clients. I assay Charlie Mooreââ¬â¢s leadership style. I will see how things could have been handled differently, if they would have applied teamwork and good leadership to the equation. INTRODUCTION Chattanooga Ice Cream, Inc. was a division of Chattanooga Food Corporation, which was founded in 1936. The Ice Cream Division of Chattanooga Foods was one of the largest regional ice cream manufacturers in the United States, (Sloane, The Chattanooga Ice Cream Division, HBR, p.2). Following the loss of Stay & Shop one of their largest customer, Charlie Moore the divisionââ¬â¢s president and general manager, and his executive management had severalà meetings to discuss the future of the division and their product. Moore was responsible for the outcome of the companyââ¬â¢s future, and dealing with the conflicting attitudes and opinions of the members of his team. It was his responsibility to make sure everyone was on the same page to get the company back up and running properly. CHARLIE MOORE AS A LEADER If I had to give detail as to what type of leader Charlie Moore was on the DiSC he would be a S & C leader. He preferred an orderly environment. He believed in collaborating to get things accomplished. The Downfall of Chattanooga Ice Cream 4 He strived to make progress in the company. He wanted to help the company meet its goals with getting its products back on the market and being competitive. He also wanted to have the team make steady and careful progress toward meeting the goals for the company. Moore values groupââ¬â¢s efforts. He is not an aggressive leader and tends to avoid competitive environments and conflict. ââ¬Å"Disdaining such behavior, Moore feigned a deaf ear to it, hoping his subordinates would get the signal and cease complaining about each other.â⬠,(Sloane,2003, p.2). These are all good qualities to have in a leader, but I think it also led to his failure as a leader. When Moore took over the division he came with a history of leading openly, preferring to operate in an environment of group decision making. He assumed that everyone would be able to come together in agreement as to what direction the company should go in. His judgment proved detrimental to the team. As the management team was incapable of coming to a compromise, because they had no respect for their teammates. Their action physically and verbally showed a lack of trust for one another. Everyone was pointing the finger, and no one person saw fault in their part of the companyââ¬â¢s downfall. Moore never developed an environment of trust among his team members. Moore did not prepare the team for the change that was to come. He needed to ââ¬Å"prepare organizations for change and help them cope as they struggle through itâ⬠Week 2, Lecture -What Great Leaders Do. Instead of showing ââ¬Å"positive energyâ⬠(Welch, 2005, p.84) he called the team together to ââ¬Å"mournâ⬠(Sloane, 2003, p.1). So he had already set a negative atmosphere for the meeting. Moore showed a lack of Candor. As a leader he should have all the questions, and those questions should create a debate among the team members, ââ¬Å"Rule 6: Leaders probe with curiosity that borders on skepticism, making sure your questions unleash debate and raise issues that get actionâ⬠(Welch,2005,p.74). Charlie should have come into those meetings with a communication strategy. That way the team would have understanding, and everyone would support a common vision. THE TEAM DYNAMIC AND DYSFUNCTION All companies have ups and downs. All companies win accounts and loose accounts. What all companies should not have are teams that bicker, point the finger at each other and donââ¬â¢t communicate. This type of behavior is symptomatic of an unhealthy environment, and will be detrimental to a company. That is the type of behavior that was displayed by the Chattanooga Ice Cream Division. When the Shop & Stay account was lost each of the management team members seemed to think that the blame for the loss of the account laid in every other department other than their own. They thought that, that department needed to be corrected. Rather than taking a good close look at their department, and seeing what could be improved there. There were a lot of negative energy and emotions involved in the meetings, which halted the chance for real teamwork. There were too many Chiefs and not enough Indians. Everyone was acting as managers except for the realà manager. Moore was a leader who made decisions publically. Unlike the former manager of the division who made decisions privately without the consensus of the rest of the team. THE DOWNFALL OF CHATTANOOGA ICE CREAM 7 The old leadership did not foster an environment where team work and group decisions were accommodated. They in turn did not know how to communicate with one another, and the team dynamic became one of conflict. There were no clear operating rules for the team on how decisions were going to be made. Week 4, Lecture ââ¬â Building High Performance Teams suggests that ââ¬Å"when managers agree on ground rules in advance, the teams are much more likely to run efficiently,â⬠which Moore did not do. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHATTANOOGA ICE CREAM DIVISION My first recommendation would be for Charlie Moore to see that is not just one of the team members. He is the Manager, their Supervisor. No goals can be obtained and no decisions can be made if he as there leader does not step up and take ownership of his role. You want bigger solutions ask questions; healthy debate, decisions, and actions will get everyone thereâ⬠(Welch, 2005, p. 76). A team will only be as good as its leader. If I were the leader I would have the teams do research on the competitors. Then I would have them target other clients to take on our product to make up for the clients we lost. I would also create an environment to get the team motivated to accomplish a new goal, and have them focus their efforts on one vision. I would also strategically pair the team memberââ¬â¢s individual weaknesses and strengths together, not only to complement each other, but to build credibility and trust among the team. As a leader I would start to build a foundation for candor, voice, and dignity going forward. By setting these rules in place the team will learn how to communicate effectively. By makingà these changes this will ensure each individual has a voice, while not obstructing the process of productivity.
Monday, January 6, 2020
Ceo Robert A. Disney Corporation - 1561 Words
In his letter to shareholders that proceeds the 2014 financial report, Disneyââ¬â¢s CEO Robert A. Iger divulges Disneyââ¬â¢s brand strategy, he states, ââ¬Å"weââ¬â¢ve reached this level of sustained success by focusing on three strategic priorities that unlock the limitless potential of this remarkable company: unparalleled creativity, innovative technology, and global expansionâ⬠(Fiscal Year 2014 3). Though Iger does not specifically refer to Disney Theatrical Productions (DTP) in his letter, the companyââ¬â¢s strategic priorities most certainly extend to DTP. The Walt Disney Corporation (WDC) is divided into four segments: Media Networks (ABC, ESPN, Disney Channel), Parks and Resorts, Studio Entertainment, and Consumer Products. DTP is a part of the Studio Entertainment Division. According the Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Financial Report, Disney Theatrical Group develops, produces and licenses live entertainment events. The Company has produced and licensed Broadway productions around the worldâ⬠¦Disney Theatrical Group licenses the Companyââ¬â¢s intellectual property to Feld Entertainment, the producer of Disney On Ice and Disney Live!. (14) This statement makes up merely one small paragraph in a 214 page document, which parallels the reality that DTP is but one tiny drop in the Walt Disney Corporation bucket. It is also difficult to track what percentage of the WDC DTP represents for several reasons. First and foremost, given the fact that DTP is a department under the studio entertainmentShow MoreRelatedLeadership Skills And Organization Of Walt Disney969 Words à |à 4 Pages WALT DISNEY LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGY SUBJECT NAME : MGMT20131 Organizational and Governance Leadership GROUP MEMBERS : SHAIK AZHARUDDIN(s0273889) GAYAM SESHI REDDY(s0280903) SAI KIRAN PALLIKONDA(s0278967) SIVAPRAVEEN SIVASANKAR(s0277212) LECTURER NAME :Read MoreStrategy Formation at Disney Under Michael Eisner1284 Words à |à 6 PagesExtra Credit Strategy formation at Disney under Michael Eisner Walt Disney was a real visionary in term of animations. He developed his capability to select new ways to invent special cartoons, with a Disneys prestige that was going to be the most famous brand in terms of family entertainment. Sinceà Walt Disneys death in 1966, The Walt Disney Company had barely survived appropriation attempts by other corporations. Its shareholdersà Sid Bassà andà Roy E. Disneyà brought on Michael Eisner and FrankRead MoreWalt Disney Company s Influence On The Entertainment Industry1152 Words à |à 5 PagesThe Walt Disney Company has grown rapidly over time becoming one of the leading companies in the entertainment industry and continues to excel with no signs of slowing down. The Walt Disney Company has diverse operations in different aspects of the entertainment industry. Media networks, parks and resorts, studio entertainment, consumer products and interactive media are all interconnected branches of The Walt Disney Company that have expanded int o global markets. Having such diverse operations amongstRead MoreExamples of ââ¬Å"Goodâ⬠Strategic Management1293 Words à |à 6 PagesMANAGEMENT Disney In 1984, Disneyââ¬â¢s stock price had been flat for a decade. Earnings per share were only $0.06. Disney had profits that year of $242 million. By this point in time Disney had become primarily a theme park company. Seventy seven percent of its profits came from theme park operations that year. Twenty two percent of profits came from consumer products (licensing Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, etc.). Only one percent of profits came from filmed entertainment in 1984. Indeed, Disney had becomeRead MoreOrganizational Excellence And Change Of Walt Disney1526 Words à |à 7 PagesORGANIZATION 1 Introduction Walt Disney was created by a man named Walter Elias Disney in Chicago, Illinois; he was an animator and motion picture producer. In 1923 they located to Los Angeles, California and he partner with his brother Roy in the Disney Bros Studio. ?Recently they have been called the paradigm of America and intolerance of a debaser of culture and have carried animation through the central figure in the history of animation. Walt Disney Company is a creative organizationalRead MoreControl Mechanisms: The Walt Disney Company: Team project1358 Words à |à 6 PagesControl Mechanisms: The Walt Disney Company Introduction Organizations use control mechanisms to help regulate guidelines and procedures which contribute toward effectively achieving organizational goals. The Walt Disney Company is a well known entertainment organization that has become tremendously successful both nationally and internationally over the past 70 years or so partly through successful implementation of control mechanisms throughout every aspect of the organization. The purpose of thisRead MoreThe Management Of The Walt Disney Company1243 Words à |à 5 Pagesof major corporations that manage to control media has decreased significantly, resulting in a high concentration of ownership. In 2011, only six media companies were responsible for 90% of the things we saw and heard on a daily basis compared to fifty companies in 1983 (Lut z, 2012). The Walt Disney Company is one of them. In this report, we will take a look at how the Company has succeeded in growing into the media corporation it is today. A Look into the Companyââ¬â¢s History The Walt Disney CompanyRead MoreDisney : The Top 500 Companies With Highest Gross Revenue1316 Words à |à 6 Pagescompanies with highest gross revenue. Disney is ranked 53rd on the list. The business at The Walt Disney well tells a story that the mouse has money, despite some near-term concerns. Disney is well diversified in entertainment has good fundamentals, and has benefited from the recent movie debut. Star Wars movie success, and with Finding Dory has proved profitable for Disney. The company is also expected to profit from its Parks and Resorts, The new Shanghai Disney, as well as the ongoing success ofRead MoreCompensation Program for Walt Disney Company1890 Words à |à 7 PagesCompensation Program for Walt Disney Company: Walt Disney Company is an expanded global company with operations in four major business segments i.e. Studio Entertainment, Media Networks, Consumer Products and Parks and Resorts. The company has a workforce of more than 15,000 employees in more than 40 countries across the globe. In addition to having a huge workforce, the firm is largely renowned for its success and profitability in all its business segments on an annual basis. One of the most importantRead MoreCase Study : Disney s Best Practices1310 Words à |à 6 Pagesthe Customers In this step, Disney Institute tries to gain a deeper understanding of whatever organization they are hired to assess and help prosper. They get information of how the company works by having personal interviews as well as requesting hard data. With this information, the institute will see what tactic is necessary to make the company a successful one. 2. Adapt and Apply Disneyââ¬â¢s Best Practices Disney Institute uses real-world examples from The Walt Disney Company to associate the business
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)